Sollte eine bilaterale Tubektomie zukünftig die Tubenligatur ersetzen?

Ausgewählte Literatur:

– Peterson H.B., Xia Z., Hughes J.M., Wilcox L.S., Tylor L.R., Trussell J.: The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1161

– Vaughan S. et al.: Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer 2011 Sep 23; 11 (10): 719–25

– Dietl J., Wischhusen J., Häusler S.F.: The post-reproductive Fallopian tube: better removed? Hum Reprod 2011 Nov; 26 (11): 2918–24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der274. Epub 2011 Aug 16. Review

– Lessard-Anderson C.M.R., St. Sauver J., Weaver A., Bakkum- Gamez J., Dowdy S., Cliby B.: The impact of tubal sterilization techniques on the risk of serous ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) study. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130: e25–6

– Kwon J.S., Tinker A., Pansegrau G., McAlpine J., Housty M., McCullum M. et al.: Prophylactic salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy as an alternative for BRCA mutation carriers. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 14–24

– Creinin M., Zite N.: Female Tubal Sterilization: The Time Has Come to Routinely Consider Removal.

Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 596–599

– McAlpine J.N., Hanley G.E., Woo M.M., Tone A.A., Rozenberg N., Swenerton K.D. et al.: Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention. Am J Obstet